Home // Neurociências // Archive by category "Neurociência Computacional"

Artigos em neurociência teórica, criticalidade em árvores dendríticas

journal.pcbi.1000402.g001

Leonardo Lyra Gollo me incentivou a retomar o blog. Obrigado pelo incentivo, Leo!

Single-Neuron Criticality Optimizes Analog Dendritic Computation

Leonardo L. GolloOsame KinouchiMauro Copelli
(Submitted on 17 Apr 2013)

Neurons are thought of as the building blocks of excitable brain tissue. However, at the single neuron level, the neuronal membrane, the dendritic arbor and the axonal projections can also be considered an extended active medium. Active dendritic branchlets enable the propagation of dendritic spikes, whose computational functions, despite several proposals, remain an open question. Here we propose a concrete function to the active channels in large dendritic trees. By using a probabilistic cellular automaton approach, we model the input-output response of large active dendritic arbors subjected to complex spatio-temporal inputs, and exhibiting non-stereotyped dendritic spikes. We find that, if dendritic spikes have a non-deterministic duration, the dendritic arbor can undergo a continuous phase transition from a quiescent to an active state, thereby exhibiting spontaneous and self-sustained localized activity as suggested by experiments. Analogously to the critical brain hypothesis, which states that neuronal networks self-organize near a phase transition to take advantage of specific properties of the critical state, here we propose that neurons with large dendritic arbors optimize their capacity to distinguish incoming stimuli at the critical state. We suggest that “computation at the edge of a phase transition” is more compatible with the view that dendritic arbors perform an analog and dynamical rather than a symbolic and digital dendritic computation.

Comments: 11 pages, 6 figures
Subjects: Neurons and Cognition (q-bio.NC)
Cite as: arXiv:1304.4676 [q-bio.NC]
(or arXiv:1304.4676v1 [q-bio.NC] for this version)

Mechanisms of Zero-Lag Synchronization in Cortical Motifs

(Submitted on 18 Apr 2013)

Zero-lag synchronization between distant cortical areas has been observed in a diversity of experimental data sets and between many different regions of the brain. Several computational mechanisms have been proposed to account for such isochronous synchronization in the presence of long conduction delays: Of these, the phenomena of “dynamical relaying” – a mechanism that relies on a specific network motif (M9) – has proven to be the most robust with respect to parameter and system noise. Surprisingly, despite a contrary belief in the community, the common driving motif (M3) is an unreliable means of establishing zero-lag synchrony. Although dynamical relaying has been validated in empirical and computational studies, the deeper dynamical mechanisms and comparison to dynamics on other motifs is lacking. By systematically comparing synchronization on a variety of small motifs, we establish that the presence of a single reciprocally connected pair – a “resonance pair” – plays a crucial role in disambiguating those motifs that foster zero-lag synchrony in the presence of conduction delays (such as dynamical relaying, M9) from those that do not (such as the common driving triad, M3). Remarkably, minor structural changes to M3 that incorporate a reciprocal pair (hence M6, M9, M3+1) recover robust zero-lag synchrony. The findings are observed in computational models of spiking neurons, populations of spiking neurons and neural mass models, and arise whether the oscillatory systems are periodic, chaotic, noise-free or driven by stochastic inputs. The influence of the resonance pair is also robust to parameter mismatch and asymmetrical time delays amongst the elements of the motif. We call this manner of facilitating zero-lag synchrony resonance-induced synchronization and propose that it may be a general mechanism to promote zero-lag synchrony in the brain.

Comments: 27 pages, 8 figures
Subjects: Neurons and Cognition (q-bio.NC)
Cite as: arXiv:1304.5008 [q-bio.NC]
(or arXiv:1304.5008v1 [q-bio.NC] for this version)

Número de neurônios no cérebro é cinco vezes maior que o número de árvores na Amazônia

Fiz a seguinte conta:  peguei a estimativa de 86 bilhões de neurônios no cérebro e comparei com o número de árvores sugerido pela reportagem abaixo (ou seja, 85/15*2,6 bilhões).  Deu que o cérebro corresponde a cerca de seis Amazônias (em termos de árvores).

Acho que essa é uma comparação importante para quem quer entender, modelar ou reproduzir um cérebro.  Você aceitaria tal tarefa sabendo que é mais difícil do que modelar a Amazônia???

PS: Sim, eu venho acalentando faz tempo que a melhor metáfora para um cérebro é uma floresta, não um computador. Acho que se aplicarmos ideias de computação paralela por meio de agentes, acabaremos encontrando que florestas computam (por exemplo, a sincronização das árvores de ipês, que hora emitir os aerosóis que nucleiam gotas de chuva e fazem chover sobre a floresta etc.). OK, é uma computação em câmara lenta (e é por isso que a não enxergamos).

PS2: Norberto Cairasco anda também encafifado sobre as semelhanças entre dendritos de neurônios e de árvores. Acha que pode haver alguma convergência evolucionária para certas funções, embora em escalas diferentes.

Aproximadamente 2,6 bilhões de árvores foram derrubadas na Amazônia Legal até 2002

 

01/06/2011 – 11h09

Repórter da Agência Brasil

Rio de Janeiro – Cerca de 15% do total da vegetação original da Amazônia Legal foram desmatados, o que equivale à retirada de aproximadamente 2,6 bilhões de árvores e ao desmate de uma área de 600 mil quilômetros quadrados até 2002. Esse cenário corresponde à destruição de 4,7 bilhões de metros cúbicos de madeira de uma área que, originalmente, representava 4 milhões de quilômetros quadrados cobertos por florestas. Read more [+]

Como colocar papers no ArXiv?

Siga o seguinte algoritmo:

1. Faça um paper (ou pelo menos assine um).

2. No dia em que estiver submetendo o paper para a revista, entre no site do Arxiv ( a menos que você ache que seu paper é muito revolucionário – ou mal escrito – para alguma revista publicar).

3. Leia as instruções de como colocar um paper no ArXiv que estão aqui.

4. Siga as instruções e coloque seu paper ao ArXiv.

From: [email protected]
To: leonardo@****
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2012 2:10:11 AM
Subject: arXiv Replacement -> 1109.2036 in q-bio.NC from leonardo@****

Your replacement of 1109.2036 by submission submit/******* has
been published and is available at:

http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.2036

The paper password for this article is: *****
Please share this with your co-authors. They may use it to claim ownership.

Abstract will appear in today’s mailing as:

arXiv:1109.2036
From: Leonardo L. Gollo <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 15:03:09 GMT   (77kb)
Date (revised v2): Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:10:34 GMT   (668kb)

Title: Statistical Physics approach to dendritic computation: The
excitable-wave mean-field approximation
Authors: Leonardo L. Gollo, Osame Kinouchi and Mauro Copelli
Categories: q-bio.NC
Comments: 30 pages, 8 figures
Journal-ref: Phys. Rev. E, 85, 011911 (2012)
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.85.011911

We analytically study the input-output properties of a neuron whose active
dendritic tree, modeled as a Cayley tree of excitable elements, is subjected to
Poisson stimulus. Both single-site and two-site mean-field approximations
incorrectly predict a non-equilibrium phase transition which is not allowed in
the model. We propose an excitable-wave mean-field approximation which shows
good agreement with previously published simulation results [Gollo et al., PLoS
Comput. Biol. 5(6) e1000402 (2009)] and accounts for finite-size effects. We
also discuss the relevance of our results to experiments in neuroscience,
emphasizing the role of active dendrites in the enhancement of dynamic range
and in gain control modulation.

Phys. Rev. E 85, 011911 (2012) [13 pages]

Statistical physics approach to dendritic computation: The excitable-wave mean-field approximation

Abstract
References
Download: PDF (859 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

 Leonardo L. Gollo*
IFISC (CSIC – UIB), Instituto de Física Interdisciplinar y Sistemas Complejos, Campus Universitat Illes Balears, E-07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain

Osame Kinouchi
Laboratório de Física Estatística e Biologia Computacional, Departamento de Física, FFCLRP, Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida dos Bandeirantes 3900, 14040-901 Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil

Mauro Copelli
Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 50670-901 Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

Received 12 September 2011; revised 23 November 2011; published 12 January 2012

We analytically study the input-output properties of a neuron whose active dendritic tree, modeled as a Cayley tree of excitable elements, is subjected to Poisson stimulus. Both single-site and two-site mean-field approximations incorrectly predict a nonequilibrium phase transition which is not allowed in the model. We propose an excitable-wave mean-field approximation which shows good agreement with previously published simulation results [ Gollo et al. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5 e1000402 (2009)] and accounts for finite-size effects. We also discuss the relevance of our results to experiments in neuroscience, emphasizing the role of active dendrites in the enhancement of dynamic range and in gain control modulation.

©2012 American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.85.011911
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevE.85.011911

PACS:

87.19.ll, 05.10.-a, 87.19.lq, 87.19.ls

LASCoN 4 – Latin American School of Computational Neuroscience

EVENTOS / LASCON 2012 – IV Latin American School on Computational Neuroscience
Descrição

Entre 15 de janeiro a 10 de fevereiro de 2012 será realizada, no Departamento de Física da FFCLRP, sob organização do Prof. Dr. Antônio Carlos Roque da Silva Filho, a 4ª Edição da Escola Latino-Americana de Neurociência Computacional – LASCON IV.

 

A escola terá a duração de quatro semanas e serão abordadas questões como: biofísico detalhados modelos único neurônio; modelos simplificados neurônio; modelos de rede neural; plasticidade sináptica e modelos de memória; modelos em nível de sistema cerebral; teoria da informação e análise de pico de trem, e neurociência cognitiva computacional. Estes modelos serão ilustrados com o uso de programas como neurónio, neuroConstruct, XPP-AUTO, NEST e Matlab.

 

O corpo docente é composto por uma equipe internacional de pesquisadores de renome mundial no campo da neurociência computacional. O evento será realizado em período integral (manhãs, tardes e noites) no bloco 1 das exatas (prédio do Departamento de Computação e Matemática).
 
 
 
Maiores informações:
Prof Dr. Antonio C. Roque
Departamento de Física da FFCLRP/USP
Tel: +55 16 3602-3768
Fax: +55 16 3602-4887
E-mail: [email protected]
URL: http://sisne.org/LASCON

Mais um paper (nosso) em Avalanches Neuronais

O interessante desse trabalho é que as redes são de neurônios inibitórios… Lembrar de falar para o Maurício enfatizar isso na dissertação!

This article is part of the supplement: Twentieth Annual Computational Neuroscience Meeting: CNS*2011

Open AccessPoster presentation

 

Signal propagation and neuronal avalanches analysis in networks of formal neurons

Mauricio Girardi-Schappo1*, Marcelo HR Tragtenberg1 and Osame Kinouchi2

Author Affiliations

1 Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, 88040-970, Brazil

2 Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil

For all author emails, please log on.

 
 
 
 

BMC Neuroscience 2011, 12(Suppl 1):P172 doi:10.1186/1471-2202-12-S1-P172

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/12/S1/P172

Published: 18 July 2011

© 2011 Girardi-Schappo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Poster presentation

To study neurons with computational tools, one may call upon, at least, two different approaches: (i) Hodgkin-Huxley like neurons [1] (i.e. biological neurons) and (ii) formal neurons (e.g. Hindmarsh-Rose (HR) model [2], Kinouchi-Tragtenberg (KT) model [3], etc). Formal neurons may be represented by ordinary differential equations (e.g. HR), or by maps, which are dynamical systems with continuous state variables and discrete time dynamics (e.g. KT). A few maps had been proposed to describe neurons [3-10]. Such maps provide one with a number of computational advantages [10], since there is no need to set any precision on the integration variable, which leads to better performance in the calculations.

An extended KT neuron model, here called KTz model, has been studied in [4] and [5], may be supplied with a Chemical Synapse Map (CSM) in order to study interacting neurons in a lattice, in the framework of coupled map lattices. KTz model presents most of the standard behavior of excitable cells like fast spiking, regular spiking, bursting, plateau action potentials and adaptation phenomena, and the CSM is in good agreement with some standard functions used to model post-synaptic currents, like the alpha function or the double-exponential function [4]. Preliminary results indicate antiferromagnetic oscillatory behavior or plane wave behavior in KTz neurons coupled with inhibitory CSM on a square lattice.

Besides, many systems in nature are characterized by complex behavior where large cascades of events, named avalanches, unpredictably alternate with periods of little activity (e.g. snow avalanches, earthquakes, etc). Avalanches are described by power law distributions and when the branching parameter equals to unity, the system is said to be a self-organized critical (SOC) system [13]. These have been observed for neuronal activity in vitro [11,12]. And since both SOC systems and neuronal activity show large variability, long-term stability and memory capabilities, networks of neurons have been proposed to be SOC systems. This hypothesis was tested in [13], where they made comparisons among in vivo recordings using Local Field Potentials in three macaque monkeys performing a short term memory task and three different well-established subsampled SOC models (e.g. Sandpile model, Random Neighbour Sandpile model and Forest Fire model). Some similar comparison has been done in [14] with in vivo data from fourteen rats and a cellular automaton developed by the authors.

We claim that still no simulation has been made to detect whether formal or realistic neuron models can evolve naturally to a SOC state, in a full or subsampled network. Our simulations are made with KTz model, which is a formal neuron, but keeps the usual behaviors of living cells, connected through CSM on a square lattice. We divided the work into two parts: (i) the analysis of network itself and how it evolves with time from a given initial state, varying its parameters and (ii) the analysis of the data generated by a network of silent cells, stimulated at random sites, trying to resemble the SOC models above. We compare these second part results with the experimental ones presented in [11-13].

References

  1. Hodgkin A, Huxley A: A quantitative description of membrane current.

    J Physiol 1952, 117(4):500-544. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

    Return to text

  2. Hindmarsh JL, Rose RM: A model of neuronal bursting.

    Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1984, 221:87-102. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    Return to text

  3. Kinouchi O, Tragtenberg MHR: Modeling neurons by simple maps.

    Int J Bifurcat Chaos 1996, 6:2343-2360. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    Return to text

  4. Kuva SM, Lima GF, Kinouchi O, Tragtenberg MHR, Roque AC: A minimal model for excitable and bursting elements.

    Neurocomputing 2001, 38-40:255-261. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    Return to text

  5. Copelli M, Tragtenberg MHR, Kinouchi O: Stability diagrams for bursting neurons.

    Physica A 2004, 342:263-269. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    Return to text

  6. Chialvo DR: Generic excitable dynamics on a two-dimensional map.

    Chaos Solit Fract 1995, 5:461-479. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    Return to text

  7. Rulkov NF: Modeling of spiking-bursting neuronal behavior using two-dimensional map.

    Phys Rev E 2002, 65:041922. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    Return to text

  8. Cazelles B, Courbage M, Rabinovich M: Anti-phase regularization.

    Europhys Lett 2001, 56:504-509. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    Return to text

  9. Laing CR, Longtin A: A two variable model of somaticdendritic interactions.

    Bull Math Biol 2002, 64:829-860. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    Return to text

  10. Izhikevich EM, Hoppensteadt F: Classification of bursting mappings.

    Int J Bifurcat Chaos 2004, 14(11):3847-3854. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    Return to text

  11. Beggs JM, Plenz D: Neuronal avalanches in neocortical circuits.

    J Neurosci 2003, 23(35):11167-11177. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    Return to text

  12. Beggs JM, Plenz D: Neuronal avalanches are diverse and precise activity patterns that are stable for many hours in cortical slice cultures.

    J Neurosci 2004, 24(22):5216-5229. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    Return to text

  13. Priesemann V, Munk MHJ, Wibral M: Subsampling effects in neuronal avalanche.

    BMC Neurosci 2009, 10:40. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

    Return to text

  14. Ribeiro TL, Copelli M, Caixeta F, Belchior H, Chialvo DR, Nicolelis MAL, Ribeiro S: Spike avalanches exhibit universal dynamics across the sleep-wake cycle.

    PLoS One 2010, 5(11):e14129. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

    Return to text

Skype com cerveja! Bebê sobre dendritos ativos saindo do forno no PRE

De: Leonardo Lyra
Para: Mauro Copelli, Osame Kinouchi Filho
Data: quarta-feira, 21 de dezembro de 2011 12:35:39
Assunto: skype com cerveja!

Oi pessoal,

Vocês lembram que havíamos combinado que faríamos uma reuniao de “skype com cerveja” para discutir sobre diversos projetos e sobretudo coisas da vida? Havia entretanto a ressalva que esta reuniao só deveria acontecer depois do PRE ser aceito. Pois bem, comunico que já podemos fazer nossa reuniao! Entao, qual é o melhor dia pra vocês para o skype com cerveja?

Um abraço,

leo

——– Original Message ——–

Subject: Acceptance EJ10756 Gollo
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 09:28:39 -0500

Re: EJ10756 Statistical physics approach to dendritic computation: The excitable-wave mean-field approximation by Leonardo L. Gollo, Osame Kinouchi, and Mauro Copelli Dear Dr. Gollo, We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been accepted for publication as a Regular Article in Physical Review E. We would also like to bring the appended referee comments to your attention. Your manuscript will now be prepared for the production process. If any issues arise we will contact you, otherwise your manuscript will be forwarded directly to our production department. Please do not send a revised manuscript or figures at this time unless requested. Yours sincerely, Margaret Foster Senior Assistant Editor Physical Review E Read more [+]

Neutrinos, Higgs e LHC no BLOGPULSE

Gentileza gera Gentileza

Parece que ser gentil realmente dá certo!

Dear Osame,
Thank you for your explanation, my understanding about your paper improves much with your help. Your warm heart impresses me!
Be happy and healthy.
Z.

Dear Z.,

The model studied is a general one, that is, an excitable media with probabilistic couplings. The level where we can apply such model depends on the interest of the researcher: the elements could be persons in a epidemiological model (so, our model would be a probabilistic SIRS model), a neuronal network model (with excitatory couplings), a model of a glomerulus in the olfactory bulb (the particular application that we made in the paper), a mean field model of a dendritic arbor (see reference bellow) or even as a model of sensor networks of bacteria (to model bacterial chemotaxis).

The particular level which you desire to apply the model will constrain and set the acceptable parameter ranges. If you are interested to model excitatory networks of neurons, you are right that one shoud use n=3 or n=4, so that the refractory period is similar to the spike width.

As you can see in Eq. (3), the refractory time governed by n affects the results only quantitatively, not qualitatively. We have studied all the cases from n=3 (that is, if spike = 1ms, then refractory period = 1ms) up to n = 10, but reported only the n=10 case because indeed we was interested in large refractory periods in the glomerulus (the particular application wich we made at the final part of the paper).

As stated in the pag. 349 of the paper, we have also studied the case with assymetrical p_ij and no difference is found. The reference to synchronization phenomena in the glomerulus is made as evidence of the presence of gap junctions in that system (More strong evidence is by now avaiable by the recent direct observation of such electrical synapses). If we apply external inputs to the system, synchronization appears, as can be seen in Fig.2c and 2d.

This sinchronization under inputs is what is observed in the experimental papers. Only the spontaneous activity is in the form of avalanches, as found in experiments by Plenz. Our couplings are fast in the sense that there is no delay times at the couplings, when a site is excited, the neighbours could be excited at the following time step, without delay.

I hope that these observations coul be useful for your interests.

Presently we are working with dendritic computation, with a similar model in a tree structure, see here and here. In this model the refractory period is small and the couplings vary from the symmetric case to the full assymetric case.

Best regards,

Osame

Dear Osame,
I’m sorry I did not express myself clearly. My question is not about simulation, but about the physical meaning about your cellular automata
model. It seems not so reasonable.

First, in your model, there is a very long refractory period for each cell, but in real neurons, the refractory period is usually very short. So
I wonder what makes you do such an adventurous hypothesis.

Second, in your paper, you mentioned many times about the electrical synapse. The electrical synapses have two properties, it is fast and symmetrical. But I cannot figure out what ingredient in your model represents the property of “fast”. As to the property of symmetrical, you assume that p_ij=p_ji; but I don’t know whether the network can still perform so well without such symmetrical property. Have you done such a simulation on your computer? How the result?

What’s more, still about the electrical synapse, you refer some articles about the electrical synapses and the synchronization of the network in your paper. But I’m afraid I still cannot figure out what’s the relationship between the contents of the papers you mentioned and the content of your own paper. It seems that there is nothing about synchronization of the network in your paper.

Best wishes,
Z.

Dear Z.,
I am not sure about what is your question. The model is simply a generalized Greenberg-Hastings cellular automata in a random network where the conections p_ij are draw from a simple uniform distribution in [0,pmax]. Notice however that the mean field calculation assumes that p_ij = p (homogeneous network) and that this approximation seems to describe the behavior very well.

If you are having any difficulty to reproduce the results, I can send you more details about the exact procedure for the simulations.

Cheers,

Osame

—–Menssagem Original—–
De: “Z. B.”
Enviado 08/12/2011 07:20:43

Assunto: A question about your paper

Dear Prof. Kinouchi,

I’m a Chinese student, recently I’m reading your paper “Optimal dynamical range of excitable networks at criticality”  published in Nature Physics. However, I’m really puzzled by the model you proposed: where does it come from, how do you think out? Could you explain about it for me?

Thanks!

Besh wishes,

Z.

Será que a teoria de Crick-Mitchison sobre sonhos está correta?

Pois é, que pena que não havia este experimento quando eu tentei publicar o paper no BBS em 2002…  Stickgold era um dos referees, os outros também não simpatizavam com a teoria de Crick-Mitchison, daí ficou por isso mesmo. Mas, a partir de 2009, Matthew P. Walker elaborou a hipótese de regulação emocional da amigdala , usando explicitamente a ideia de que durante a fase REM a reatividade frente a memorias emocionais seria “esquecida” em vez de reforçada, uma idéia claramente inspirada na Teoria de Aprendizagem Reversa de Crick-Mitchison.

Mas eu ainda acho que os canabinoides tem a ver com esse processo, e os autores do estudo abaixo não falaram isso. Em todo caso, vou mandar o link do paper para o pessoal de Berkeley…

 http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0208590

PS: Este paper foi resubmetido à Behavioral and Brain Sciences

26/11/2011 - 18h50

Sonho pode apagar memórias negativas

SABINE RIGHETTI
DE SÃO PAULO

Qual a receita para apagar uma memória dolorosa? O tempo, claro –incluindo o tempo gasto no sono e nos sonhos. É o que sugere uma pesquisa da Universidade da Califórnia em Berkeley (EUA).

De acordo com os cientistas, os processos químicos cerebrais durante o sonho ajudam a filtrar as experiências emocionais negativas.

É na fase de sonhos do sono, conhecido como REM (sigla inglesa para “rapid eye movement”, ou movimento rápido do olho), que o cérebro trabalha as experiências emocionais. Essa fase equivale a 20% de uma noite.

O estudo dos EUA contou com 34 jovens saudáveis, divididos em dois grupos.

Metade viu 150 imagens “fortes” na parte da manhã e à noite -eles ficaram acordados entre as sessões. A outra metade dormiu uma noite entre as visualizações (veja infográfico acima).

Os pesquisadores observaram que aqueles que dormiram entre as visualizações relataram uma reação emocional melhor às imagens.

Além disso, exames de ressonância magnética dos participantes enquanto dormiam mostraram uma redução na atividade da amígdala (região cerebral que processa as emoções) no sono profundo.

REM

“Esse é o resultado mais interessante do trabalho. Não havia ainda uma relação comprovada entre sono REM e redução da atividade da amígdala”, analisa o neurocientista Sidarta Ribeiro, da UFRN (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte).

Os resultados sinalizam a importância do sonhar. “O estágio do sonho é uma espécie de terapia durante a noite”, explica Matthew Walker, principal autor do estudo que está na “Current Biology”.

O trabalho também indica porque as pessoas com estresse pós-traumático, como veteranos de guerra, sofrem com pesadelos.

A “terapia noturna” não funciona direito em pessoas traumatizadas, pois o sono REM costuma ser interrompido recorrentemente.

Ao dormir, a pessoa revive o trauma porque a emoção não foi devidamente arrancada da memória no sono.

Os pesquisadores também registraram a atividade do cérebro dos participantes enquanto eles dormiam, usando eletroencefalograma.

Durante o sono REM, a atividade cerebral diminui. Isso indica que a queda de estresse no cérebro ajuda a processar as reações emocionais às experiências do dia.

“Durante o sono REM há uma diminuição dos níveis de norepinefrina, um neurotransmissor associado ao estresse”, explica Walker.

Os pesquisadores da Universidade da Califórnia em Berkeley têm trabalhado há algum tempo ligando o sono ao aprendizado, à memória e à regulação do humor. Mas ainda não há um consenso científico sobre a função do sonho na saúde das pessoas.

Até a publicação de “A Interpretação dos Sonhos”, de Sigmund Freud, concluída no final do século 19, os sonhos eram vistos como premonições ou eram relacionados a problemas digestivos.

Freud lançou a ideia de que o sonho tinha uma ligação com o processamento inconsciente das emoções.

“Hoje, fazemos trabalhos que têm a ver diretamente com o que Freud estudou, mas de maneira mais aprofundada”, explica Ribeiro.

Dreams, endocannabinoids and itinerant dynamics in neural networks: re elaborating Crick-Mitchison unlearning hypothesis

Osame KinouchiRenato Rodrigues Kinouchi
(Submitted on 30 Aug 2002 (v1), last revised 12 Jul 2010 (this version, v3))

In this work we reevaluate and elaborate Crick-Mitchison’s proposal that REM-sleep corresponds to a self-organized process for unlearning attractors in neural networks. This reformulation is made at the face of recent findings concerning the intense activation of the amygdalar complex during REM-sleep, the role of endocannabinoids in synaptic weakening and neural network models with itinerant associative dynamics. We distinguish between a neurological REM-sleep function and a related evolutionary/behavioral dreaming function. At the neurological level, we propose that REM-sleep regulates excessive plasticity and weakens over stable brain activation patterns, specially in the amygdala, hippocampus and motor systems. At the behavioral level, we propose that dream narrative evolved as exploratory behavior made in a virtual environment promoting “emotional (un)learning”, that is, habituation of emotional responses, anxiety and fear. We make several experimental predictions at variance with those of Memory Consolidation Hipothesis. We also predict that the “replay” of cells ensembles is done at an increasing faster pace along REM-sleep.

Comments: 18 pages, 2 figures, Revised version (2010)
Subjects: Disordered Systems and Neural Networks (cond-mat.dis-nn); Chaotic Dynamics (nlin.CD); Popular Physics (physics.pop-ph); Quantitative Biology (q-bio); Neurons and Cognition (q-bio.NC)
Cite as: arXiv:cond-mat/0208590v3 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

Sobre cientistas malucos, computação neuronal e coincidências

Estranha coincidência este post do Nassif, que apareceu no Twitter ao mesmo tempo que o meu post sobre cientistas malucos engenheiros…

A IBM e seu professor aloprado

Enviado por luisnassif, sab, 12/11/2011 – 11:55

Por wilson yoshio

Da Info

O Einstein da IBM

Juliano Barreto

São Paulo – O senhor da foto que abre esta reportagem é o estereótipo do cientista maluco. Os poucos cabelos que lhe restam estão brancos e eriçados. A barba é mantida comprida e os olhos são levemente arregalados. Para completar o look, um óculos de grau é estrategicamente colocado na ponta do nariz. Mas não pense que John Maxwell Cohn, cientista-chefe de design e automação de chips da IBM, se incomoda quando alguém lhe chama de professor aloprado ou dr. Brown, o inventor da máquina do tempo da trilogia De Volta Para o Futuro. Ao contrário. O americano de 52 anos adora o contraste entre sua sólida biografia de pesquisador e uma longa lista de experimentos inusitados.

Cohn disputou o reality show A Colônia, do Discovery Channel, no qual os participantes tinham de inventar objetos e ferramentas com materiais escassos para sobreviver em um mundo pós-apocalíptico. Ele criou um veículo elétrico e um lançador de chamas. Nas horas vagas, o cientista usa placas programáveis do tipo Arduino para criar máquinas tão estranhas quanto um monstro de 5 metros de altura, com rosto de abóbora de Halloween, que divertiu (e, é preciso dizer, aterrorizou) as crianças da vizinhança onde mora com a mulher, no estado de Vermont, nos Estados Unidos.

Nos últimos tempos, o cientista maluco da IBM tem se dedicado a um dos projetos mais desafiadores da sua vida: a criação de um processador que simula o funcionamento do cérebro humano. “A computação cognitiva propõe o uso de redes neurais com bilhões de processadores extremamente simples, capazes de imitar o cérebro em tarefas que podem ser feitas melhor por meio do aprendizado do que do cálculo”, disse Cohn a INFO. Read more [+]