Nos tempos de estudante sempre reverenciávamos os tempos heróicos da Mecânica Quântica e a coragem de seus fundadores. Mas será que realmente gostariamos de viver naquela época de confusão e queda de paradigmas centrais da física classica? Ou será que seriamos mais conservadores e céticos, esperando ver (confirmações definitivas ou um consenso científico) para crer em vez de acreditar que realmente uma nova física estava surgindo?
Roque propôs que se fizesse um estudo estatistico dos papers do ArXiv sobre os neutrinos superluminais. Pelo que vi até agora, dos 113 artigos sobre o assunto no repositorio, não tem nenhum de algum fisico brasileiro. A equipe de fisicos brasileiros que vai acompanhar o experimento MINOS em 2013 já anunciou que é cetica.
Será que os brasileiros, por herança cultural lusitana, seriam mais conservadores? Cadê a tão propalada criatividade do brasileiro?
Essa noticia que saiu agora explicaria o ajuste fino de alpha em nossas redondezas. Se alpha varia continuamente, talvez estivessemos em uma regiao critica de transicao: será que o nosso universo é critico e está na borda de uma transicao de fase entre duas regioes, como no caso de uma rede onde um gradiente de p (num modelo de percolacao) produz p=p-c na borda entre uma regiao percolante e uma regiao nao percolante?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2056018/Laws-physics-change-depending-universe.html
Laws of physics ‘are different’ depending on where you are in the universe
- Laws we know may be ‘like local by-laws’ say scientists
- Hints universe is bigger than we think – possibly infinite
- Other parts of the universe may be hostile to life
By ROB WAUGH
Last updated at 12:36 PM on 1st November 2011
The quasar ULAS J1120+0641: Scientists measured the light from distant quasars for the ‘signatures’ of metal atoms in between us and the distant galactic nuclei – they found that the measurements were different from similar ones on Earth
The laws of physics may not be as set in stone as previously imagined.
One of the laws of nature seems to vary depending on where in the universe you are, research suggests.
The new analysis of data from Hawaii’s Keck telescope and Chile’s Extremely Large Telescope, could have profound implications for our understanding of the universe.
The ‘constancy’ of physics is one of the most cherished principles in science – but the scientists say that the ‘laws’ we know may be the galactic equivalent of ‘local by-laws’ and things may work quite differently elsewhere.
The discovery – if true – violates one of the underlying principles of Einstein’s theory of General Relativity, and has profound implications for our understanding of space and time.
The findings could mean that the universe is far bigger than we thought – possibly even infinite.
It also means that in other parts of the universe, the laws of physics might be hostile to life – whereas in our small part of it, they seem fine-tuned to supporting it.
Research carried out at the University of New South Wales (UNSW), Swinburne University of Technology and the University of Cambridge found that one of the four known fundamental forces, electromagnetism – measured by the so-called fine-structure constant and denoted by the symbol ‘alpha’ – seems to vary across the Universe.
The two telescopes at the W.M. Keck Observatory on Mauna Kea on the Big Island of Hawaii. Scientists used data from these, and from the Extremely Large Telescope in Chile to search 300 distant galaxies
The researchers looked at light from distant quasars – huge, bright objects that outshine their host galaxies – to see how the light was absorbed by metallic atoms such as chromium, iron, nickel and zinc on its billion-year journey to us.
The researchers looked at 300 distant galaxies. The experiment found that the atoms in space behaved differently from ones on earth.
‘The results astonished us,’ said Professor Webb. ‘In one direction – from our location in the Universe – alpha gets gradually weaker, yet in the opposite direction it gets gradually stronger.’
‘The discovery, if confirmed, has profound implications for our understanding of space and time and violates one of the fundamental principles underlying Einstein’s General Relativity theory,’ Dr King added.
The scientists used distant quasars – huge, bright galactic nuclei – to ‘illuminate’ metal atoms in between them and earth. Analysing the light found that they behaved differently from atoms on Earth
The first hints that alpha might not be constant came a decade ago when Professor John Webb and other colleagues at UNSW and elsewhere, analysed observations from the Keck Observatory, in Hawaii. Those observations were restricted to one broad area in the sky.
However, now Webb and colleagues have doubled the number of observations and measured the value of alpha in about 300 distant galaxies, all at huge distances from Earth, and over a much wider area of the sky.
The new observations were obtained using the European Southern Observatory’s ‘Very Large Telescope’ in Chile.
‘Such violations are actually expected in some more modern ‘Theories of Everything’ that try to unify all the known fundamental forces, said Professor Flambaum.
‘The smooth continuous change in alpha may also imply the Universe is much larger than our observable part of it, possibly infinite.’
‘Another currently popular idea is that many universes exist, each having its own set of physical laws,’ Dr Murphy said. ‘Even a slight change in the laws of Nature means they weren’t ‘set in stone’ when our Universe was born.
‘The laws of Nature you see may depend on your “space-time address” – when and where you happen to live in the Universe.’
Professor Webb said these new findings also offer a very natural explanation for a question that puzzled scientists for decades – why do the laws of physics seem to be so finely-tuned for the existence of life?
‘The answer may be that other regions of the Universe are not quite so favourable for life as we know it, and that the laws of physics we measure in our part of the Universe are merely ‘local by-laws’, in which case it is no particular surprise to find life here,’ he said.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2056018/Laws-physics-change-depending-universe.html#ixzz1ecjm6rEb
Acho que estou devendo uma pizza para o Jorge Stolfi. Como disse Giovani Amelino-Camelia, a chance dos neutrinos superluminais realmente existirem era de uma para dez mil, mas apostar nessa possibilidade era por demais tentador, pois participar de uma revolução científica com essa chance é bem melhor do que apenas fazer trabalhos tecnicamente corretos e mesmo elegantes, mas de significância marginal. 
Anel de Blogs Científicos
Comente!